Friday, 12 June 2026
Italian Constitutional Court hearing of June 9, 2026 on Citizenship by Descent: what happened and when the ruling is expected
By Avv. Salvatore Aprigliano — Studio Legale Aprigliano
Published June 12, 2026
On June 9, 2026, the Italian Constitutional Court held a public hearing on the constitutionality of Article 3-bis of Law no. 91/1992, introduced by the Tajani reform. No decision was announced at the hearing: the Court reserved its ruling, which is expected, indicatively, between mid-july and september 2026.
What happened at the hearing of June 9, 2026?
On Tuesday, June 9, 2026, the Italian Constitutional Court (Corte costituzionale) held a public hearing in Rome on the constitutional challenges to Article 3-bis of Law no. 91 of February 5, 1992, introduced by Decree-Law no. 36/2025 and converted into Law no. 74/2025, the so-called “Tajani reform” of Italian citizenship by descent (iure sanguinis).
The challenges were raised by three referral orders, heard jointly:
- referral order no. 4/2026 from the Court of Mantua;
- referral orders nos. 40 and 41/2026 from the Court of Campobasso.
At the hearing, counsel for the private parties argued for a declaration of unconstitutionality of the provision, which restricts the recognition of Italian citizenship by descent. The State Attorney’s Office (Avvocatura dello Stato) defended the constitutionality of the reform.
At the end of the arguments, as the procedure requires, the Court did not announce any decision: the judges reserved their deliberation for closed session (camera di consiglio).
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Has the Italian Constitutional Court issued a press release after the hearing?
No. As of June 10, 2026, the Constitutional Court has not issued any press release on the outcome of the deliberation concerning the citizenship cases.
This point deserves clarification, because it is causing confusion among Italian descendants following the case: after the hearing of March 11, 2026, the one that later produced Judgment no. 63/2026, the Court issued a press release the very next day. That press release, however, was an exception, adopted because of the particular significance of that decision.
A press release anticipating the outcome is not a mandatory step in Italian constitutional proceedings. The absence of a press release in these days therefore signals nothing, neither favorable nor unfavorable, about the outcome of the decision.

When will the Constitutional Court ruling on citizenship be published?
There are two possible scenarios.
- A press release in the coming days. The Court may choose to anticipate the substance of its decision with a press release, as it did in March. If so, it will likely happen within a few days of the deliberation.
- Waiting for the written judgment. If no press release is issued within the next week, it is reasonable to assume the outcome will only become known upon the filing of the written judgment. Drafting and filing typically take an estimated 40–50 days from the hearing. Considering the August judicial recess (sospensione feriale), publication is expected, indicatively, between mid/late July 2026 and September 2026.
What is at stake for Italian descendants
Article 3-bis of Law no. 91/1992 has radically restricted the recognition of Italian citizenship iure sanguinis, introducing preclusions that affect tens of thousands of pending proceedings and millions of Italian descendants worldwide, particularly in Brazil, Argentina, the United States, Venezuela, Canada and Australia.
The Constitutional Court is essentially called upon to decide whether the State may retroactively apply the new restrictions to people who, under the traditional principle of iure sanguinis, were considered Italian citizens from birth.
The decision comes in a landscape already shaped by Judgment no. 63 of April 30, 2026, which redefined the interpretive framework in this area, and by recent case law of the Italian Court of Cassation reaffirming the original nature of the right to citizenship by descent.
What should descendants with pending proceedings do now?
Nothing different from before: pending proceedings follow their course, and no deadline arises for petitioners from the June 9 hearing. What is essential is not to base any decision on unofficial interpretations circulating on social networks and online groups.
Studio Legale Aprigliano, which on April 17, 2026 obtained from the Court of Bologna ruling no. 3335/2026 the first favorable ruling recognizing Italian citizenship by descent after the entry into force of the reform, monitors the Constitutional Court’s official sources daily and will update this page with every development. For an individual assessment of your case, contact the Firm.
Frequently Asked Questions
Has the Tajani law been declared unconstitutional?
No, not yet. As of June 10, 2026, the Constitutional Court has neither announced nor published any decision on Article 3-bis of Law no. 91/1992. The hearing was held on June 9, 2026 and the decision was reserved.
When will the Constitutional Court ruling on Italian citizenship by descent be published?
Absent an anticipatory press release, the written judgment is estimated to be filed 40–50 days after the June 9, 2026 hearing, indicatively between mid/late July and September 2026, given the August judicial recess.
Why has the Court not issued a press release, as it did in March?
A press release anticipating the outcome is an exception, not a rule, in constitutional proceedings. Its absence indicates nothing about the outcome of the decision.
Which referral orders did the Court discuss on June 9, 2026?
Referral order no. 4/2026 from the Court of Mantua and referral orders nos. 40 and 41/2026 from the Court of Campobasso, all concerning Article 3-bis of Law no. 91/1992 as introduced by Law no. 74/2025.
Do pending citizenship proceedings stop while awaiting the ruling?
No, not automatically. Each proceeding follows its own course according to the judge’s determinations. An individual assessment is required for each specific case.
How does Judgment no. 63/2026 relate to the June 9 hearing?
Judgment no. 63 of April 30, 2026 is the Court’s previous ruling in this area, arising from the hearing of March 11, 2026. The June 9 hearing concerns further, distinct challenges to Article 3-bis.
This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every situation requires an individual assessment.